[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: April 17th Draft of the Voting GR

>> On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:18:33 -0400,
>> Raul Miller <moth@magenta.com> said: 

 > However, given that "defeats" is a verb and we're using "defeat" as
 > a noun, maybe it would be clearer to say:

 > 4. We construct the Schwartz set based on undropped options and
 >         defeats:
 > a. The vote tallies comparing option A and option B are a defeat of
 >               option B if V(A,B) is strictly greater than V(B,A).

 > Is that clearer?

	Unfortnatly, for me this has become les clear. Until this
 point, I the verb defeat was undefined; and I think we need to define
 defeat the verb before we define defeat the gerund. 

	Adding a 4.a.i would work, but not replacing the current 4.a

$s=(localtime(time))[0]; sub n { ($a - $b) * $s; } print
grep(s/.*\t//,sort n grep($_=++$i/-50."\t$_",split(/\n*/,<<JAPH)));
,rekcah lreP rehtona tsuJ JAPH Andrew.Vignaux@comp.vuw.ac.nz (Andrew
Vignaux) 22 Aug 90 11:10:18 GMT
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: