Re: integrity of elections
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:35:02AM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:03:41 -0600
> Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > My original point was that people who do not actually
> > exercise their franchise are unlikely to be one of the active set --
> > and need to be looked at to see if they are indeed inactive. Having
> > inactive members is not itself unhealthy, except it does inflate
> > quorum a trifle, which can be bad in supermajority votes.
> >
>
> I would like to see NM'ers who have been in the queue for more than 6 months be able to vote.
I disagree. Isn't it better to solve the problem of long wait times than
to give people priviledges early? Priviledges that potentially they may
not otherwise get (ie if they are rejected).
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: