integrity of elections
I did not vote in this election. I know who I'd have voted for, if I
did vote, but I'm struggling with some more fundamental issues.
More generally, most Debian decisions have been made by an "activist
elite". So far, that's seemed to work fairly well -- perhaps because
of our charter, we've been able to trust that people interested in an
issue will make well informed decisions about that issue.
Or: I don't see the non-involvement of myself (or others) as a sign of
ill health for the organization. It's the way things have always been --
we're a group of volunteer specialists, not political activists.
Of course, I might be wrong -- but if so, I think I'd liked to be
convinced based on significant examples (as opposed to generalist
[And, yes, I do need to be more active as a developer -- you are correct