Re: integrity of elections
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:03:41 -0600
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> My original point was that people who do not actually
> exercise their franchise are unlikely to be one of the active set --
> and need to be looked at to see if they are indeed inactive. Having
> inactive members is not itself unhealthy, except it does inflate
> quorum a trifle, which can be bad in supermajority votes.
I would like to see NM'ers who have been in the queue for more than 6 months be able to vote.