Re: Another proposal.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:55:05PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:10:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > *shrug* I don't care about quorums :)
> > We could trivially deal with quorums by saying: "The quorum is met
> > if Q ballots are received from distinct voters. If quorum is not met,
> > the default option wins."
> Let's say quorum is 45. Let's say we have a ballot with two options,
> A and B. No supermajority. B is the default option. Votes are:
Like I said, I don't care about quorums. That sort of behaviour is
more traditional though: you have a quorum of 10, 9 people turn up,
but nothing can get done. Another person turns up, doesn't matter how
he votes, stuff can get done.
Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''