[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Another proposal.

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:55:05PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > If even one of the people voting BA had refused to vote, A would have
> > lost.

On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:00:17AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> So what?  The quorum is not a tool to make small margins seem larger,
> isn't it?

No, but the losing to the default option has exactly the same
implementation as failing to meet quorum.

In essence, a vote which ranks the default option first is a no-confidence
vote against the ballot itself.


Reply to: