[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Another proposal.

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:27:46PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:12:46PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > if the quorum is 72, and seventy people vote, then quorom is not met,
> > > and the vote is invalidated on those grounds. regardless if all vote ABF
> > > and thus A has supermajority (at any ratio) over B and F.
> > That would be bad.
> I don't see why.  It would discourage spiteful voting.  ;-)

I don't think it'd do even that; our quorum with 1000 developers is 
1.5 * sqrt(1000) or about 48. Having a turn out of under 48 people seems
incredibly unlikely.

Requiring a total turn out of N is roughly the same as requiring a turn out
in favour of N/2, anyway.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''

Reply to: