[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed General Resolution : IRC as a Debian communication channel

>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> writes:

 Raphael> Great, I'm glad to hear that what I said is only common
 Raphael> sense. Now if you can convince the operator in question to
 Raphael> respect that common sense, i may have no problem stopping
 Raphael> here with the GR.

 Raphael> My problem is that the operator in question said that he
 Raphael> would continue doing like he did until we decide on a new
 Raphael> policy. I acknowledge the fact that he stopped kicking
 Raphael> people since the the issue came out, but I wonder what he
 Raphael> will do if I withdraw my general resolution.

 Raphael> I'd accept to stop my general resolution if Branden said
 Raphael> publicly here something like : « I won't ever kick anyone
 Raphael> from #debian-devel unless the concerned
 Raphael>   person is voluntarily trying to harm #debian-devel »

 Raphael> (here: to harm means "dropping the S/N ratio")

 Raphael> It's up to Branden to decide now.

	I don't believe this. The only reason you brought this GR
 forth is because you had problems with a non debian controlled  IRC
 channel operator? You had the gall to have us go through this whole
 process just because some unrelated op somewhere (who may well be a
 debeian developer) has in some way behaved in a manner displeasing to
 you? It does not seem important to you that Debian has no control
 over the channel?


 But soft you, the fair Ophelia: Ope not thy ponderous and marble
 jaws, But get thee to a nunnery -- go! Mark "The Bard" Twain
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: