Re: Proposed General Resolution : IRC as a Debian communication channel
>>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <email@example.com> writes:
Raphael> Great, I'm glad to hear that what I said is only common
Raphael> sense. Now if you can convince the operator in question to
Raphael> respect that common sense, i may have no problem stopping
Raphael> here with the GR.
Raphael> My problem is that the operator in question said that he
Raphael> would continue doing like he did until we decide on a new
Raphael> policy. I acknowledge the fact that he stopped kicking
Raphael> people since the the issue came out, but I wonder what he
Raphael> will do if I withdraw my general resolution.
Raphael> I'd accept to stop my general resolution if Branden said
Raphael> publicly here something like : « I won't ever kick anyone
Raphael> from #debian-devel unless the concerned
Raphael> person is voluntarily trying to harm #debian-devel »
Raphael> (here: to harm means "dropping the S/N ratio")
Raphael> It's up to Branden to decide now.
I don't believe this. The only reason you brought this GR
forth is because you had problems with a non debian controlled IRC
channel operator? You had the gall to have us go through this whole
process just because some unrelated op somewhere (who may well be a
debeian developer) has in some way behaved in a manner displeasing to
you? It does not seem important to you that Debian has no control
over the channel?
But soft you, the fair Ophelia: Ope not thy ponderous and marble
jaws, But get thee to a nunnery -- go! Mark "The Bard" Twain
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C