Re: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation of 4.1.5
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 05:08:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > As to the social contract/dfsg issue; I think that arguably
> > they can be deemed to be separate documents, perchance living in the
> > same file by happenstance; in most correspindence since we have
> > refeerred to them individually.
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 10:17:28PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
> I agree here. Let's take this opportunity to split them. List them both
> as foundational documents if we intend to do so, but split them
> regardless.
I think the reason that they're stuck together is so that it's
unambigous in the social contract what is meant where it says
"Debian Free Software Guidelines".
At this point, I guess it's likely that people have gotten the point.
Thanks,
--
Raul
Reply to: