Re: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation of 4.1.5
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:37:44PM -0800, C.M. Connelly wrote:
> JC> I agree here. Let's take this opportunity to split them.
> JC> List them both as foundational documents if we intend to
> JC> do so, but split them regardless.
>
> Can we do that without a vote? ;-)
NFI, if we all think it should happen, I don't see why process should
stand in the way of doing something harmless to the text file to match the
way the project actually treats them.
I've got a feeling it WOULD require another vote though, under IWJ's
marvelous contribution to Debian procedural gridlock.
--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
<Knghtbrd> Okay, you people have started talking about BSDM applications of
network hardware... I think I'll run off and do something useful
and Debianish and stay OUT of this one...
<Knghtbrd> (for a change)
Reply to: