Re: The constitution and the social contract
>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
Thomas> But one of the secretary's hats is Interpreter Of The Constitution.
Thomas> That is a judicial role, and it is important for judges to preserve
Thomas> the appearance of neutrality.
And your opinion is that having an opinion and voicing it does
not preserve an appearnace of nuetrality? You really think the if the
secretary voices no opinions he has none? Indeed, I would think
represesing opinions may lead to more abuse (while we are on the
subject of conspiracy theories), since then one may not know what
biases the secretary has and thus can't watch out for violations.
Are we then children that we can't ahve opiniuons and yet
conduct our jobs impariall;y? (boy, we are really dumb to have
elected a DPL who would appoint such an unprofessional incompetent to
the job of secretary).
Shall we stop muzzling other people and just get on with
finding what peoples opinions are on these crucial issues so we can
all get a collectivce move on?
manoj
--
When you and I are far apart Can sorrow break your tender heart? I
love you darling, yes I do; Sleep is so sweet when I dream of you;
All you are is a blossoming rose. Night is here so I must close. With
care read the first word of each line. You will find a question of
mine. Yours hopefully, The VAX.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: