Re: The constitution and the social contract
Hi,
>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
Thomas> Because the Project Secretary has apparently vanished from the face of
Thomas> the earth, you're it. As such, it's inappropriate for you to make
Thomas> substantive suggestions about resolution, given that you will also be
Thomas> the person charged with deciding constitutional questions and the
Thomas> like.
I beg to differ. Becoming a secretary does not mean one gives
up ones right to an opinions (indeed, if it does, I'll strongly
exhort people never to step up and volunteer for such a
disenfranchising post).
I thihk it is insulting to imply that the secretary can't keep
his different hats separated enough to allow his own opinions to
taint his performance as an office bearer in the project.
I am saddened to note that we have fallen to this level of distrust.
manoj
--
If I'd known computer science was going to be like this, I'd never
have given up being a rock 'n' roll star. Hirst
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: