[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The constitution and the social contract

>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:

 Thomas> Because the Project Secretary has apparently vanished from the face of
 Thomas> the earth, you're it.  As such, it's inappropriate for you to make
 Thomas> substantive suggestions about resolution, given that you will also be
 Thomas> the person charged with deciding constitutional questions and the
 Thomas> like.

	I beg to differ. Becoming a secretary does not mean one gives
 up ones right to an opinions (indeed, if it does, I'll strongly
 exhort people never to step up and volunteer for such a
 disenfranchising post).

	I thihk it is insulting to imply that the secretary can't keep
 his different hats separated enough to allow his own opinions to
 taint his performance as an office bearer in the project.

	I am saddened to note that we have fallen to this level of distrust.

 If I'd known computer science was going to be like this, I'd never
 have given up being a rock 'n' roll star. Hirst
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: