On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:31:59PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 10:16:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > So the Chairman of the Technical Committee needs to be nagged to > > perform his duties? He can't be expected to subscribe to debian-vote > > and notice that weeks pass after a CFV and the Project Secretary still > > hasn't issued a ballot? > > What makes you think that it's the duty of the technical committee > chairman to step in when no one cares to talk about a vote? When the antagonists have arranged themselves, are sick of arguing, have issues the CFV's per the Constitution, and are simply waiting for the Project Secretary to issue a ballot so they can vote? Did you even bother to read my message about why the proposals should be regarded as expired? I see. If we want the Technical Committee to ever clean up after the Secretary's mess, we much flame each other nonstop until they do so. All right. I'm sure this can be accomplished. Thanks for suggesting strategies for increasing the signal-to-noise ratio on our lists. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | If encryption is outlawed, only outlaws branden@debian.org | will @goH7OjBd7*dnfk=<q4fDj]Kz?. http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpGFMvDN0yoY.pgp
Description: PGP signature