On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 10:54:49AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > John Goerzen writes: > > > 4. During the Secretary's absence, the Constitution specifies that the > > chairman of the Technical Committee should step up in his place. > > However, that person is Ian Jackson and he failed with this duty. The > > Technical Committee have failed to replace him with someone more > > active in the Project. > > Did anyone actually call upon the Techincal Committee or its chair? > It's possible that they dont' keep up with -private, and/or kill-filed > the whole enormous flamewar... So the Chairman of the Technical Committee needs to be nagged to perform his duties? He can't be expected to subscribe to debian-vote and notice that weeks pass after a CFV and the Project Secretary still hasn't issued a ballot? -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Mob rule isn't any prettier just because branden@debian.org | you call your mob a government. http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpIRAMQHfclB.pgp
Description: PGP signature