Re: Summary of voting irregularities
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 10:16:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> So the Chairman of the Technical Committee needs to be nagged to
> perform his duties? He can't be expected to subscribe to debian-vote
> and notice that weeks pass after a CFV and the Project Secretary still
> hasn't issued a ballot?
What makes you think that it's the duty of the technical committee
chairman to step in when no one cares to talk about a vote?
[That's certainly not what the constitution states, and that's not how
I understand the intent of the constitution.]