Re: List usage for voting discussion (subject changed for Wichert)
On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 12:12:44AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 10-Jun-99, 17:29 (CDT), Hamish Moffatt <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > For other ballots, I would be; for this one, I didn't find any
> > discussion necessary. I can't see why all discussion of a ballot
> > must occur on the debian-vote list. Most of these things being on
> > debian-devel, and could remain there.
> Sigh. When we have non-technical discussion on debian-devel, people
> bitch and say "use another group" (thus the creation of debian-vote,
> -discuss, and innumerable other groups). When we then use those groups,
> people bitch because they miss the discussion. I sometimes think it's
> the same people arguing both ways (not implying that Hamish is doing
If the official purpose of this list is for discussions about the actual
ballots (like about the different logos for example, rather than about
the process of voting) then I'm cool with that. As long as ballots
are on -devel-announce (which Darren and Wichert say they are),
I'll just treat it like any other list.
So, pretend I never said anything :-)
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB (ex-VK3TYD).
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.