Re: ZFS pool size (Re: else or Debian)
On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 15:19 +0100, DdB wrote:
> Am 10.11.2022 um 14:28 schrieb DdB:
> > Take some time to
> > play with an installation (in a vm or just with a file based pool should
> > be considered).
>
> an example to show, that is is possible to allocate hugefiles (bigger
> than a single disk size) from a pool:
>
> > datakanja@PBuster-NFox:~$ mkdir disks
> > datakanja@PBuster-NFox:~$ cd disks/
> > datakanja@PBuster-NFox:~/disks$ seq -w 0 15 | xargs -i truncate -s 4T
> > disk{}.bin # this creates sparse files to act as virtual disks
> > datakanja@PBuster-NFox:~/disks$ zpool create TEST raidz3 ~/disks/d*
> > datakanja@PBuster-NFox:~/disks$ zpool list
> > NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CKPOINT EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH
> > ALTROOT
> > TEST 64.0T 314K 64.0T - - 0% 0% 1.00x ONLINE
> > -
> 16*4 TB = 64 TB size
> > datakanja@PBuster-NFox:~/disks$ zfs list TEST
> > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> > TEST 254K 50.1T 64.7K /TEST
> # due to redundacy in the pool, the maximum size of a file is slightly
> over 50TB
>
> #do not forget to clean up (destroying pool and files)
>
Ok, but once the space gets actually allocated, things blow up. Or what happens
when you use partitions and allocate more space than the partitions have?
Reply to: