[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: masked service file



On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 15:27:13 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:54:43PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 31 Aug 2021 at 14:48:02 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 07:31:22PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> > > > On 2021-08-31 18:49, john doe wrote:
> > > > > You can simply 'unmask' it and see how it goes.
> > > > 
> > > > Is there a way to find out why it is masked ?
> > > 
> > > Starting from a point of zero context?  Probably not.
> > > 
> > > You MIGHT be able to scroll back through your terminal history and
> > > see what happened when you installed whatever package contains this
> > > mystery service.  Maybe there will be informative output.
> > > 
> > > If there's no terminal still containing the session where you installed
> > > the package, you can check /var/log/apt/term.log* and maybe one of those
> > > will have a copy of the session and its output.  Again, maybe there will
> > > be informative output in the session's output.  Maybe there won't.
> > > 
> > > Maybe there will be documentation under /usr/share/doc/PKGNAME that
> > > tells you why the service is masked, and that you need to perform steps
> > > X, Y, Z to be able to use the service.  Maybe there won't.  Hard to tell
> > > without knowing the name of the package and the name of the service.
> > 
> > The OP doesn't say whether he can scan or or not.
> > 
> > He could give the name of the scanner he is using and what is given
> > by
> > 
> >   scanimage -L
> 
> It would also be nice to see "systemctl status <servicename>".

And even
 
 systemctl status saned.socket

 and 

 systemctl status saned@.service"

-- 
Brian.


Reply to: