On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 10:59:39PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > [dd] > > > > > > Next I would like to publish those tweaked and local packages in a local > > > repository in a corporate intranet, so that I could add this repository to > > > sources.list and its packages should override the standard Debian ones. > > > > Ah, a new direction to branch into :-) > > > > There are instructions on how to set up a Debian repository, e.g. > > here [1]. > > Maybe I'm looking in the completely wrong direction? Maybe it would be > easier to install such "special" packages with Docker or Snap or > something similar? Would this eliminate the problem of dependencies and > clean builds? There are many ways to skin that cat. If you feel at home with Docker, by all means, go with it. A simple chroot, or a bit more comfy, schroot, do the same as Docker does (for this use case!) with far less machinery. That's why I do prefer those "leaner" approaches. Don't know about Snap. But the best tool is the one which fits your hand :) Those "chrooty [1]" approaches find their limits whenever you depend on a kernel version different from what your machine has. Then, possibly a VM is in order. With a chrooty approach, what you do is: - prepare a base image. Debootstrap can help you with that. Or you trust a pre-built image "out there" (Docker-y people do this. For me, that's The Horror :) - chroot into that, install whatever build dependencies you need - typically, set up a directory as a kind of "mailbox" to get things in (package source, possibly build scripts) and out (your steaming, freshly built package). This is often done with a bind-mount (schroot, and probably Docker wrap those things for you, you just make some adjustments to some config files) - build away! Cheers [1] Docker is, AFAIK, also a "chrooty" approach. - t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature