[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

(solved) Re: ssh fingerprint mismatch for one single client




Yes. Given the data you've provided, I retract my first hunch: it seems
your student is seeing a different host:

 - either DNS resolves to a different IP address -- then you'd see
   different IP addresses for your server as viewed from your student's
   workstation wrt the "rest of the world

 - or routing sends your student to a different host (claiming the
   same IP address, that stinks ;-)

Traceroute might help in the second case. Besides, you wouldn't see your
student's access attempts in your server logs -- after all, he's knocking
at another door.

Cheers
 - t


Dear Linuxers,

I just want to close this issue by thanking everyone who chipped in with help and attempts to solve the problem

Unfortunately the mistery will go on, because my student solve the problem by  changing his  ISP server.

He told that the problem was solved immediately, as we predict and tested (via mobile and the neighbor's internet).

So, I cannot run any more tests, and I'll stay curious about what really happened.

My bet: the "homebrew ISP" has a DNS problem.

Thanks.

Dr. Bèco





--
Dr Beco
A.I. researcher

"I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant" -- Alan Greenspan

Creation date: pgp.mit.edu ID as of 2014-11-09

Essa mensagem é destinada exclusivamente ao seu destinatário e pode conter informações confidenciais, protegidas por sigilo profissional, direitos autorais reservados, ou cuja divulgação seja proibida por lei. O uso não autorizado de tais informações é proibido e está sujeito às penalidades cabíveis.

This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain information that is confidential and protected by a professional privilege, reserved copyright, or whose disclosure is prohibited by law. Unauthorized use of such information is prohibited and subject to applicable penalties.


Reply to: