Re: Buster with MATE without systemd
On Sat, 19 Sep, 2020 at 14:31:57 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> While I'm an LXDE user myself I do acknowledge that other DEs might have
> a different focus and/or priorities. As far as I can tell, providing
> many options is something that GNOME seems to explicitly want to avoid,
> whether we agree to it or not.
>
> If systemd provides what they need, then why should they even consider
> supporting anything else?
Making their software available on non-Linux OSes such as the *BSDs is
one reason. I guess that's a niche market though.
Reply to: