Re: Buster with MATE without systemd

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Buster with MATE without systemd
From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:23:15 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20200918072315.pdzaomuu5jvorigy@acr13.nuvreauspam>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20200916103214.1ca19b6f@debian9>
References: <[🔎] 25e108b2-3baa-8374-9437-d5210ac71c22@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20200916103214.1ca19b6f@debian9>

On Mi, 16 sep 20, 10:32:14, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> 
> Short answer?  Probably not.  systemd has become too pervasive a
> dependency to do so.  It shouldn't be.  No other init system I know of
> is.

Funny how systemd is constantly "blamed" that *other* packages depend on 
it.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Buster with MATE without systemd
  - From: Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com>

References:
- Buster with MATE without systemd
  - From: Marc Shapiro <marcnshap@gmail.com>
- Re: Buster with MATE without systemd
  - From: Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: dist-upgrade wants to deinstall lots of packages?
Next by Date: Re: dist-upgrade wants to deinstall lots of packages?
Previous by thread: Re: Buster with MATE without systemd
Next by thread: Re: Buster with MATE without systemd
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread