[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Understanding the two-year release cycle as a desktop user (and a Debian newcomer)



I install testing on all my machines*. It is very usable. Sid has given me problems in the past, so I stay clear.

*While it is true I install testing, I should clarify that I continue to use it as it moves into stable and then old-stable. Eventually, I hit some kind of "you can't get there from here" state with apt, at which point I install testing again.

John Cunningham


On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 1:06 PM Sam <debian@samueldgv.com> wrote:
Thanks for your points of view! I agree that Stable comes at a cost, and of
course if I ever were to set up a server Debian would probably be my choice.

Regarding derivatives, I know about Ubuntu, Mint, etc., but I don't exactly
like distributions tied to or ultimately dependant on commercial entities (I
want a change of air after going through Ubuntu, openSUSE...)

I have also seen independent Debian derivatives (MX Linux comes to mind), but
they either used backports or the Testing distribution.

I would happily consider using Debian Testing for example, but wherever I see
someone asking about it I always find someone discouraging from using it due
to the possibility of having broken or unsecure packages for a long time due
to it being automated. Is it actually usable for a Workstation? The same would
apply to Sid, I can no longer allow myself to fix big breakages after broken
updates (I don't know if that really happens often in Sid)

Thanks,
Sam



Reply to: