Re: kmail and encrypted mails

To: Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: kmail and encrypted mails
From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 22:58:23 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20181225215823.GA3983683@phare.normalesup.org>
Reply-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201812251535.26834.gheskett@shentel.net>
References: <[🔎] 7948001.0vtEsSIij3@protheus7> <[🔎] 201812250920.06372.gheskett@shentel.net> <[🔎] 87ftulebvj.fsf@dhh.gt.org> <[🔎] 201812251535.26834.gheskett@shentel.net>

Gene Heskett (2018-12-25):
> As for gpg not being pgp, you are likely correct, but what was gpg based 
> on originally if not pgp?

Original code.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kmail and encrypted mails
  - From: rhkramer@gmail.com

References:
- kmail and encrypted mails
  - From: Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de>
- Re: kmail and encrypted mails
  - From: Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>
- Re: kmail and encrypted mails
  - From: John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com>
- Re: kmail and encrypted mails
  - From: Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>

Prev by Date: un ban me
Next by Date: Re: kmail and encrypted mails
Previous by thread: Re: kmail and encrypted mails
Next by thread: Re: kmail and encrypted mails
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread