Re: i386 version for chrome

[john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com>]

On 10/28/2018 5:56 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2018-10-28 at 12:23, Reco wrote:
> 
>> 	Hi.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 12:04:54PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> 
> [that in a previous message, Reco wrote:]
> 
>>>> interfaces(5), the usual place.
>>>
>>> I just checked that man page on wheezy, jessie and stretch, and no 
>>> examples are found using "netmask 24"
>>
>> You asked for 'format', not 'example'.
>> The 'format' is defined at netmask under INET ADDRESS FAMILY.
> 
> In interfaces(5), you mean?
> 
> The definition for netmask I find in that section is
>     netmask mask
>         Netmask (dotted quad or CIDR)
> 
> which at a glance would lead me to expect a full CIDR-format address
> (e.g., 192.168.1.1/24) here. That would clearly seem redundant with the

TL-DR.
Don't you mean '192.168.1.0/24'?

-- 
John Doe