Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 18:35:55 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] bcfe1512-ea94-11e7-9b6a-00163eeb5320@msgid.mathom.us>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20171226222110.qx6n7qr4tqrxowi5@camaguey.connexer.com>
References: <[🔎] 6D75C6DA-288F-47C5-B5D9-483561F91632@pobox.com> <[🔎] CABzZrXd_A8H7gbUCo_8rLFVbS8JZFW6jzg9A0E=-7=+kJy==tA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20171226222110.qx6n7qr4tqrxowi5@camaguey.connexer.com>

On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 05:21:10PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:

I second XFS for your application.  Another to consider might be JFS.
Either one of those would be very mature and suitable for the
enterprise.  I don't have any real experience with JFS

I can't think of any reason to go with JFS. Among other things, XFS isactively maintained...


Mike Stone

Reply to:

References:
- Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
  - From: Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com>
- Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
  - From: Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@iki.fi>
- Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
  - From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
Next by Date: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
Previous by thread: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
Next by thread: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread