Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
From: Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 23:55:48 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] ge318s4ujmtv8@mids.svenhartge.de>
References: <[🔎] 6D75C6DA-288F-47C5-B5D9-483561F91632@pobox.com> <[🔎] CABzZrXd_A8H7gbUCo_8rLFVbS8JZFW6jzg9A0E=-7=+kJy==tA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20171226222110.qx6n7qr4tqrxowi5@camaguey.connexer.com>

Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 09:48:09PM +0200, Eero Volotinen wrote:

>>    use XFS, it's mature and suitable for big storage. (or gluster or
>>    cehp?)

> I second XFS for your application.  Another to consider might be JFS.

I believe development of JFS has stopped several years ago and I don't
think it is suitable for new deployments into production.

Grüße,
Sven.

-- 
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.

Reply to:

References:
- Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
  - From: Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com>
- Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
  - From: Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@iki.fi>
- Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
  - From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
Next by Date: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
Previous by thread: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
Next by thread: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread