[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Looks like apt-get autoremove Removed Too Much.



	After using apt-get autoremove on a jessie installation,
the system is mostly working but it now fails to initialize eth0
so it comes up with no network address. I looked back through the
8 syslog files it had and, of course, there doesn't happen to be
a syslog taken of a boot or I might be able to see what happened
when avahi-daemon got the IP address for eth0.

	For now, I manually setup eth0 by using ifconfig so it
presently has an IP address and seems to otherwise be working but
I am not sure what got removed that shouldn't have been.

	Here is what syslog said when I rebooted the system after
the autoremove:

a0 avahi-daemon[1668]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv6 with address fe80::211:11ff:fe0e:4e18.
a0 avahi-daemon[1668]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv4 with address 192.168.1.81.
a0 avahi-daemon[1668]: avahi-daemon 0.6.31 exiting.

Here it is coming back up.

a0 avahi-daemon[]: Found user 'avahi' (UID 106) and group 'avahi' (GID 113).
a0 avahi-daemon[]: Successfully dropped root privileges.
a0 avahi-daemon[]: avahi-daemon 0.6.31 starting up.
a0 avahi-daemon[]: Successfully called chroot().
a0 avahi-daemon[]: Successfully dropped remaining capabilities.
a0 avahi-daemon[]: Loading service file /services/udisks.service.
a0 avahi-daemon[]: SO_REUSEPORT failed: Protocol not available
a0 avahi-daemon[]: SO_REUSEPORT failed: Protocol not available


Tat's probably where something got zapped that shouldn't have.

This system configures it's interface via dhcp and that is what is
now not happening.

	ifconfig -a shows eth0 all right but it is not set to
anything until I manually configure it. /etc/network/interfaces
is okay. There are no huge squawks in the syslog on bootup but 
sftpd isn't starting, probably because there is no interface to
listen on. After setting eth0, vsftpd started.

Any constructive suggestions are greatly appreciated as to what
to look for that should be there but is not.

Martin McCormick


Reply to: