[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Posts don't show on list



On Friday 29 April 2016 18:33:07 Stephen Allen wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 06:33:33PM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> > On 04/27/2016 04:21 PM, Stephen Allen wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:26:36PM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > <snip>
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, it came right back.  It shows as being 'Read', but it's
> > > > > > there.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Marc
> > > > >
> > > > > You're reading the 'All Mail' Gmail directory that's why.
> > > > > Copies don't come back to one's regular inbox, but will be in
> > > > > the all mail directory if my memory serves me. By default
> > > > > Gmail won't show them in the inbox in their Webmail Gmail or
> > > > > INBOX app. Using IMAP on mutt I don't see them either unless I
> > > > > enter the all mail directory.
> >
> > Actually, no.
> >
> > I let Gmail do my filtering and all of the list's mail gets filtered
> > into a separate folder.  My posts show up there.
>
> You're telling me you put your sent mail in that folder too via a
> ruleset? Why do you want to see your sent email?

I dunno what planet you are on, but I want to see my post coming back 
from the list server to prove that the post made it to the list.  With 
gmail, the only practical way to do that is to subscribe using two 
different names, and always send to only one, but you will then get the 
list echo back on the 2nd account.  Its a PITA with gmail, but its the 
only way I know of to get around their duplicate deletion.  Then gmail 
changed the login about a year ago, so mine failed and I took that 
server off my every 3 minute scan for new mail.  And I don't miss the 
headache of dealing with gmail as it reduces my pain killer input by 
99%.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>


Reply to: