Re: no root file system after encryption
Bob Proulx writes:
> Why no LVM? Using LVM is the way I always do it because that allows
> me to encrypt a single partition and therefore only require a single
> passphrase to decrypt and load. Typically with multiple partitions
> then each and every separate partition requires a passphrase. That
> gets to be rather a pain. Having one encrypted partition for LVM and
> then using LVM to create multiple logical volumes just seems the best
> way to do things. Also with large amounts of storage having LVM is
> simply convenient. Therefore I am interested to know why you are
> avoiding LVM in your environment.
I didn't have any particular reason to avoid LVM. I just tried if
encrypted installation succeeds without it. Now that I tried with LVM,
installation was simple and worked without issues.
One thing that I noticed was that LVM option uses by default ext2 for
/boot, whereas some people on the list suggested ext4. So I manually
changed that.
Thanks for your replies,
-- Juha
Reply to: