Re: systemd alternative for Jessie?
On 2015-10-14, tom arnall <kloro2006@gmail.com> wrote:
> i read the piece on installing without systemd. i get the feeling
> that the bottom line of it is: good luck. or am i missing something?
>
> who decided that Debian shd be locked to systemd?
>
> what did they do to poll the views of the user community on the question?
>
> is it true that Red Hat had a major influence on the Debian decision makers?
>
> from what i've read so far, systemd is still very much in beta at
> best. wd people on this list agree with that?
The subject has already been debated to hell and back on this and other
lists. Please, not again.
Liam
>
>
> On 10/13/15, Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2015/10/14 13:24 "Ric Moore" <wayward4now@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> On 10/13/2015 11:20 PM, tom arnall wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I am running Wheezy and notice that the boot options include but
>>>> aren't limited to systemd. Is it possible to have this arrangement
>>>> with Jessie?
>>>
>>>
>>> No. :) Ric
>>
>> I tend to be wandering around way out in left field a lot, but
>>
>> https://wiki.debian.org/systemd#Installing_without_systemd
>>
>> Also, this is something I just saw:
>>
>> http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>>
>> Now, I must say, as near as I can tell, there is no escaping from the
>> influence of the cabal at this point, but is that what the OP was asking?
>>
>> Joel Rees
>>
>> Computer memory is just fancy paper,
>> CPUs just fancy pens.
>> All is a stream of text
>> flowing from the past into the future.
>>
>
>
Reply to: