Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> writes:
On Tuesday 28 July 2015 11:49:33 Thomas Schmitt wrote:The lure for error is even more appealing because both words have an abbreviation: "resp." and "bzw.".We are back to the nub of the problem. Not in English, it doesn't; resp. is meaningless, unfortunately.
i've seen 'resp.' used elsewhere; iirc, i've seen it used in English-language mathematics papers. And Wiktionary not only lists 'resp.' as an alternative form of 'respectively', but also gives an example of its full form as an adverb:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/respectively Alexis.