Re: Is gnome-core really the gnome minimal install?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is gnome-core *really* the gnome minimal install?
From: Seeker <seeker5528@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:23:08 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 552C962C.3070404@comcast.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] op.xw04x8kd5k9y7g@jessica.jkfloris.demon.nl>
References: <[🔎] 87lhhxp5u0.fsf@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20150412191447.GB12947@alum.home> <[🔎] op.xw04x8kd5k9y7g@jessica.jkfloris.demon.nl>

On 4/13/2015 4:59 AM, Floris wrote:

and I agree that the sentence "You have to install all end-user applications later" is incorrect.
Even Iceweasel is a dependency of gnome-core. I didn't know that Mozilla is a part of gnome.

Floris

Epiphany is the Gnome web browser, apparently the Gnome devs just want you to call it 'web' now. :-\

https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web

Maybe the Debian devs didn't think people were drinking enough kool-aid for that, so opted for
~~Fire~~ Iceweasel instead. :-)

Later, Seeker

Reply to:

References:
- Is gnome-core *really* the gnome minimal install?
  - From: Rodolfo Medina <rodolfo.medina@gmail.com>
- Re: Is gnome-core *really* the gnome minimal install?
  - From: David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk>
- Re: Is gnome-core *really* the gnome minimal install?
  - From: Floris <jkfloris@dds.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: WAS Re: debian 8 NOW game keyboard config <solved>
Next by Date: Re: debian 8
Previous by thread: Re: Is gnome-core *really* the gnome minimal install?
Next by thread: Re: Is gnome-core *really* the gnome minimal install?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: Is gnome-core *really* the gnome minimal install?

Re: Is gnome-core really the gnome minimal install?