Re: debian 8
On Friday 03 April 2015 13:05:31 Bret Busby wrote:
> On 03/04/2015, Petter Adsen <petter@synth.no> wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 17:41:44 +0800
> >
> > Bret Busby <bret.busby@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 03/04/2015, Pol Hallen wrote:
> >> > I read that at 25 april
> >> > (https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/03/msg00016.
> >> >html) should be available latest debian version.
> >>
> >> What are the expected differences between Debian 7 and Debian 8?
> >
> > https://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/ppc64el/release-notes/ch-what
> >s-new.en.html
> >
> >> Will Debian 8, when released, provide the "GNOME Classic"
> >> interface?
> >
> > From the above:
> >
> > "If you want to keep an interface closer to the GNOME 2.30 version
> > in wheezy, you can select the “GNOME Classic” session at the login
> > prompt. It will bring you an improved version of the traditional
> > panel. You can still edit the panel to add more applets, by using
> > the hidden alt+right click combination. "
>
> On my Debian 7 system, I tried to find the system monitor applet
> system, that I have running in my panel, on Debian 6, that includes 6
> little dynamic graphs indicating system status, and I could not find
> them.
>
> Are they available in Debian 7 and 8, in the GNOME classic interface?
>
>
In the event it is not, you'll be surprised at what gkrellm can show you
with an inch of space on the left or right edge of all your workspaces.
> --
> Bret Busby
> Armadale
> West Australia
> ..............
>
> "So once you do know what the question actually is,
> you'll know what the answer means."
> - Deep Thought,
> Chapter 28 of Book 1 of
> "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
> A Trilogy In Four Parts",
> written by Douglas Adams,
> published by Pan Books, 1992
>
> ....................................................
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Reply to: