On Sb, 03 mai 14, 18:25:59, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 07:48:45AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > It was an issue for the OP. It's disputable if somebody who can't solve > > such an issue on her/his own, should use testing, instead of stable. > > The issue is not whether one can solve it, but whether one should have > to. I don't even use GNOME, so shouldn't even see the > message. It gave the impression that your system would be horribly > broken if you didn't run the command, and yet the command doesn't even > exist on your system! > > This goes against the grain of having a system that just works. On one > hand you have the DIY NetBSD style where this style of information is > acceptable, while on the other hand you have a system with systemd, > pulseaudio, GNOME, where the user can be a newbie and not have to worry > about all that. > > It's like two 'opposing camps' trying to live under the one roof. I don't think this is entirely fair, this is about testing after all, not stable. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature