Re: Upgrade debacle........
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 12:06:21PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 03 mai 14, 18:25:59, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 07:48:45AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > >
> > > It was an issue for the OP. It's disputable if somebody who can't solve
> > > such an issue on her/his own, should use testing, instead of stable.
> >
> > The issue is not whether one can solve it, but whether one should have
> > to. I don't even use GNOME, so shouldn't even see the
> > message. It gave the impression that your system would be horribly
> > broken if you didn't run the command, and yet the command doesn't even
> > exist on your system!
> >
> > This goes against the grain of having a system that just works. On one
> > hand you have the DIY NetBSD style where this style of information is
> > acceptable, while on the other hand you have a system with systemd,
> > pulseaudio, GNOME, where the user can be a newbie and not have to worry
> > about all that.
> >
> > It's like two 'opposing camps' trying to live under the one roof.
>
> I don't think this is entirely fair, this is about testing after all,
> not stable.
Yeah, OK, I retract the last two paragraphs.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: