On Du, 02 mar 14, 13:28:57, Doug wrote: > On 03/02/2014 02:02 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote: > >On 02/03/14 16:53, yaro@marupa.net wrote: > >>In a few more years I imagine most people opposed to systemd won't > >>have a problem with it being there after all after using it for a bit. > >I'd be very surprised if it wasn't modified to suit the needs of the > >majority of developers - and they tend have the same itches as the > >"users", just slightly less conservative about their "needs". But I'm > >not a futurist. > >Though I did try voting conservative for a change - not surprisingly I > >was disappointed ;p > > > Has it occurred to anyone that the devs keep making changes to things > that work perfectly well, because if they didn't, they wouldn't have > anything to do, and might be out of a job? If this is supposed to be sarcasm it might be advisable to add corresponding </sarcasm> tags or so. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature