Re: Installing an Alternative Init?

[Jerry Stuckle <stucklejerry@gmail.com>]

On 11/23/2014 1:27 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 11/23/2014 12:43 PM, Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday 23 November 2014 17:23:15 Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> 'installing systemd, then removing
>>> and installing sysvinit' - was absolutely not and never could be
>>> considered the *equivalent* 
>>> of doing a *clean install with sysvinit*, 
>>> where systemd is never installed in the first place.
>>
>> The equivalent, yes.  Identical, probably no.
> 
> <sigh>
> 
> Ignorance reigns supreme.
> 
> Lisi - they are purely and simply *not* equivalents, and never can be.
> 
> They can result in the same set of files being installed - but that does
> not and never will be 'euiqvalent'.
> 
> 

I would disagree here.  If the result is the same set of files being
installed, then there is no difference between the two systems.  So they
are truly "equivalent".  In fact, they would be identical.

The question, however, is - can this equivalency be accomplished?  That
I don't know.

Jerry