Re: systemd - so much energy wasted in quarreling
On 11/10/2014 2:50 PM, Martin Read <zen75502@zen.co.uk> wrote:
> On 10/11/14 19:26, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> Exactly, it should remain in unstable unless/until it can be released
>> *perfectly* stable, so if that means it stays in unstable for 5 years,
>> so be it.
>
> If you want *perfectly* stable software, why are you using software that
> isn't formally proven?
'Perfect' was obviously a bad choice of word... but systemd is hardly
close to 'stable', in so much as 'Debian stable' is concerned...
Reply to: