On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:18:49 +0200
Raffaele Morelli <raffaele.morelli@gmail.com> wrote:
Here are some interesting things one should be aware of before
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/the-biggest-myths.html
We've all read that. My favorite Poettering manifesto is the one where
he talks of systemd subsuming packaging systems:
http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html
Read enough about but still haven't read something really valuable
against systemd from eg. Torvalds, Eric Steven Raymond, etc... (if
you do, post the link)
Isn't this quote from ESR enough "against systemd"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemd#Reception
"very prone to mission creep and bloat and likely to turn into a nasty
hairball over the longer term."
As far as Torvalds, would this qualify as something really valuable
against systemd?
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTY1MzA
"Key, I'm f*cking tired of the fact that you don't fix problems in the
code *you* write, so that the kernel then has to work around the
problems you cause."
I believe the main issue with systemd and the community mainly the
"badass-ness"
Badass is a complement. Poettering is just an ass. But if I used
ass-ness as a filter on software I use, I wouldn't use anything RMS
created, because he can be an ass, and I wouldn't use anything from the
Linux kernel, because Linus can be an ass. Ass-authored software is
used every day, by all of us. The thing is, asses like Linus and RMS
don't have a roadmap to the destruction of the software ecosystem that
created them (any more).