Re: If Not Systemd, then What?

1- Fork udev (out from systemd's tree or before it got merged / engulfed);

2- Start testing uselessd;

3- Remove systemd from Debian sources, since it is uselessd now lol ;

I vote for upstart too (instead of uselessd), since I'm using without any problems (and it is not trying to take over the world).

I believe (because I'm not a software engineer), that the main problem with systemd started when they merged udev. That was a smart move (for Them) but, there is time to take udev back and use another init, as good old days.

Jut my two bitcents...

On 20 October 2014 17:45, Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> wrote:

After much vitriolic gnashing of teeth from those opposed to systemd,
I wonder... What is a better alternative? And it can't be sysvinit.

Yes. Syvinit still works, but it is after all 20 years old. It's been
patched and bolted onto and jury-rigged to get it to do things that
weren't even around (or dreamt of) at its inception. It's long past
due for a contemporary replacement. Whatever that may be.

So, what would you all propose? For a server? Or for a user desktop?
Or something that fulfills both scenarios? And why?

Just wondering.

B

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: [🔎] 20141020124511.44a19aa7@debian7.boseck208.net" target="_blank">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20141020124511.44a19aa7@debian7.boseck208.net