Avoiding SystemD isn't hard

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Avoiding SystemD isn't hard
From: Liam Proven <lproven@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:19:08 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] CAMTenCHWZi76oZ74EfTk=i=JX0G9ifd0pv0sFLE2aUyVKQSEnw@mail.gmail.com>

A blog post explaining why it isn't mandatory, the utter futility of
the fork and more besides, clearly and simply.

http://www.vitavonni.de/blog/201410/2014102101-avoiding-systemd.html

-- 
Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven@cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven@hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) • +420 702 829 053 (ČR)

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Avoiding SystemD isn't hard
  - From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
- Re: Avoiding SystemD isn't hard
  - From: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org>
- Re: Avoiding SystemD isn't hard
  - From: Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com>
- Re: Avoiding SystemD isn't hard
  - From: "tornow@riseup.net" <tornow@riseup.net>
- Re: Avoiding SystemD isn't hard
  - From: Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: How do I restore my desktop (solved)
Next by Date: Re: Debian fork
Previous by thread: systemd - comic relief
Next by thread: Re: Avoiding SystemD isn't hard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread