[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Avoiding SystemD isn't hard



Liam Proven:
> A blog post explaining why it isn't mandatory, the utter
> futility of the fork and more besides, clearly and simply.

> http://www.vitavonni.de/blog/201410/2014102101-avoiding-systemd.html

At least in Sid libsystemd0 is a dependency of the essential package
bsdutils https://packages.debian.org/sid/bsdutils
I do see that libsystemd0 is not an init system.
I do see that it is not interesting for the next Debian stable, Jessie.
But i also see a tendency (it crawls in, no matter what). And that
doesn't make me believe it would be anything but easy. Especially in
the long run. 

I really am not in the mood to fight against the decisions made all the
time. More like: In general i agree with the decisions made and trust
them to be good for me. 
If one doesn't want systemd/libsystemd0, then Debian is not a good
choice (having to tinker all the time one can just as well run one of
the KISS distros). 

imho, of course. 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: