Re: Avoiding SystemD isn't hard
On 10/21/2014 11:19 AM, Liam Proven <lproven@gmail.com> wrote:
> A blog post explaining why it isn't mandatory, the utter futility of
> the fork and more besides, clearly and simply.
>
> http://www.vitavonni.de/blog/201410/2014102101-avoiding-systemd.html
Doesn't address - and nothing can satisfactorily address (imo) - the
issue of feature creep, and that it is very possible (even likely based
on past 'performance'?) that feature creep will indeed eventually result
in a *defacto* inability to remove it and have a functional system (that
does what you want it to do).
Reply to: