Re: Recipient validation - WAS: Re: Moderated posts?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org> wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 8:37 PM, Jerry Stuckle <jstuckle@attglobal.net> wrote:
>> Tanstaafl couldn't answer it, and you can't either, because it's not
>> violating any.
>
> I did answer it, you just ignored it or don't understand it.
>
> Quote:
>
> "You do not have to violate an RFC to break SMTP."
>
> Here is a real world example:
>
> Improperly configured TCP filtering features on firewalls and routers
> don't violate any specific RFC, but they certainly can break SMTP (and
> other things too).
Thus, we can understand that you are an idealist that would rather see
your version of SMTP rules be followed by everyone than try to follow
the RFC yourself.
Where are your SMTP rules spelled out, by the way?
--
Joel Rees
Be careful when you see conspiracy.
Look first in your own heart,
and ask yourself if you are not your own worst enemy.
Arm yourself with knowledge of yourself.
Reply to: