Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?)
On Tue 14 Oct 2014 at 06:34:17 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 14/10/2014 5:56 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >> On Lu, 13 oct 14, 12:34:27, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >>> Again.. when did the desktop become the priority for Debian. For years,
> >>> Debian (and Linux in general) has been most useful in the server
> >>> environment. Breaking server deployments, at the expense of the desktop
> >>> seems like bad policy.
> >> Do you have any evidence of systemd breaking your setup? If yes, would
> >> you please be so kind to at least file corresponding bugs?
> >
> > Hell no. I have no time at all for testing at the moment - I've got
> > production systems to maintain, and security holes to patch (I haven't
> > even begun to think how many new security holes sytsemd is going to
> > introduce).
>
> A great big +1 from me too.
>
> Exactly.
>
> Although I'm up with patching, but I most definitely don't want any
> system that I am responsible to maintain to have systemd installed, it
> is far too much risk and the changes are not warranted.
Are you incapable of reading what is on debian-user, even threads you
have participated in in the past few days?
Not having systemd as PID 1 is so easy it's unbelievable.
Reply to: