[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?



On Tue 16 Sep 2014 at 13:26:33 +0200, Erwan David wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:06:30PM CEST, Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> said:
> > 
> > mountall (2.10) lucid; urgency=low
> > 
> >   * Add hard dependency on Plymouth; without it running, mountall will
> >     ignore any filesystem which doesn't show up within a few seconds or that
> >     fails to fsck or mount.  If you don't want graphical splash, you simply
> >     need not install themes.
> 
> Then the bug should be against plymouth whose description is
> completeley misleading.
> 
> And whose conception is completely broken with same package doing two
> completely uinrelated tasks.

It's not hard to avoid installing mountall in order to use docker.io. In
case you are thinking of a bug report on mountall's dependency on
plymouth you might want to assess your chances of a successful outcome
from

   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/556372


Reply to: