Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:06:30PM CEST, Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> said:
> On Tue 16 Sep 2014 at 13:45:28 +0400, Reco wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:37:27AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > > On Tue 16 Sep 2014 at 11:32:03 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:30:08AM CEST, Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> said:
> > > > > On Tue 16 Sep 2014 at 10:51:33 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Why should installing cgroupfs-mount on a server (as recommended by
> > > > > > docker) require a graphical boot ?
> > > > >
> > > > > It doesn't.
> > > >
> > > > It does on testing (I should have precised).
> > >
> > > Neither on testing nor unstable.
> >
> > Probably OP meant THAT docker. It does:
> >
> > https://packages.debian.org/jessie/docker.io
>
> To save the OP issuing a clarification or correction:
>
> mountall (2.10) lucid; urgency=low
>
> * Add hard dependency on Plymouth; without it running, mountall will
> ignore any filesystem which doesn't show up within a few seconds or that
> fails to fsck or mount. If you don't want graphical splash, you simply
> need not install themes.
Then the bug should be against plymouth whose description is completeley misleading.
And whose conception is completely broken with same package doing two completely uinrelated tasks.
Reply to: