Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
From: Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:45:28 +0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140916094527.GA16914@x101h>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 16092014103604.3beccf368bba@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 20140916085133.GE795@rail.eu.org> <[🔎] 16092014102549.7aec580f44b7@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk> <[🔎] 20140916093203.GF795@rail.eu.org> <[🔎] 16092014103604.3beccf368bba@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk>

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:37:27AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 16 Sep 2014 at 11:32:03 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:30:08AM CEST, Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> said:
> > > On Tue 16 Sep 2014 at 10:51:33 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Why should installing cgroupfs-mount on a server (as recommended by
> > > > docker) require a graphical boot ?
> > > 
> > > It doesn't.
> > 
> > It does on testing (I should have precised).
> 
> Neither on testing nor unstable.

Probably OP meant THAT docker. It does:

https://packages.debian.org/jessie/docker.io

Reco

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
  - From: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>

References:
- docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
  - From: Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org>
- Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
  - From: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>
- Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
  - From: Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org>
- Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
  - From: Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Creating a forum for systemd debate
Next by Date: Re: Creating a forum for systemd debate
Previous by thread: Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
Next by thread: Re: docker -> cgroupfs ->mountall -> plymouth ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread