[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: brasero requires systemd-sysv



On 04/09/14 12:43, The Wanderer wrote:
On 09/03/2014 at 01:52 PM, Martin Read wrote:
was done in response to the decision of the kernel's cgroup
subsystem maintainer, Tejun Heo, that the way cgroups hierarchies
worked was terrible and a single hierarchy single-writer model
would be far more sensible.

I'm *way* behind on my LKML backlog (as in sometime in 2009, I think),
but I may have to jump forward long enough to read this discussion. Any
idea when, or under what thread title, it took place? Or if it wasn't on
the LKML per se but on one of the subsystem lists, got a link?

The original kernel discussion was in 2012; I read about it on LWN. Here are some relevant LWN.net links about the kernel change:

https://lwn.net/Articles/484251/ "Fixing control groups"
https://lwn.net/Articles/486401/ "A proposed plan for control groups"

And here's a piece about the systemd changes to accommodate it:

https://lwn.net/Articles/555920/ "Changes coming for systemd and control groups"

Here's a pertinent GMANE link from the cgroups subsystem list:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cgroups/857 "[RFD] cgroup: about multiple hierarchies"


Reply to: